ÈȵãºÚÁÏ

Flood insurance has been a staple of development since 1968 when it was created by the federal government. There are more than 20,200 communities, and as of June 30, 2011, the program had nearly 5.6 million policies in force with a total insured value of $1.246 trillion.

The major glitch has been that the program is not and has not been actuarially sound – it is hemorrhaging money and requiring bailouts from the reserve. This has led to last-minute deals in congress to keep the program authorized and funded, usually year-to-year.

This perennial revisiting of the problems posed by the deficit that the National Flood ÈȵãºÚÁÏ Program (NFIP) runs is scheduled to change with the implementation of the Biggert-Waters Flood ÈȵãºÚÁÏ Reform Act of 2012 (BW-12).

The Biggert-Waters Act of 2012 extends the NFIP for five years, while requiring significant program reform.

The law requires changes to all major components of the program:

• Flood insurance – including claims handling;
• Flood hazard mapping – use of digital flood information rate maps and remapping, as well as a careful study of the construction of levees and dams;
• Grants – mostly hazard mitigation grants;
• Management of floodplains – including stricter compliance with the 50 percent rule and other components of the Code of Federal Regulations 44 (CFR 44).

The program has never been set up to earn a reserve like other insurers are required to do. This is fine in a year with light flooding, but in years following a Katrina in 2005, or the almost-as-bad incident of Superstorm Sandy in 2012, it is catastrophic.

Most of the policies in the country are properly priced and work as they should. In fact, more than 80 percent of policyholders (representing approximately 4.48 million of the 5.6 million policies in force) do not pay subsidized rates.

About 20 percent of all NFIP policies pay subsidized rates. Only a portion of those policies that are currently paying subsidized premiums will see larger premium increases of 25 percent annually starting this year, until their premiums are full-risk premiums.

Some 5 percent of policyholders will see immediate changes for subsidized policies, including:

• Non-primary residences – This includes the concrete block slab on grade houses on almost every older beach community that floods after every storm and has to be gutted with the NFIP paying to replace the contents and finishes.
• Businesses
• Severe repetitive loss properties – Properties that over a short number of years have claims that collectively exceed the appraised value of the property.

Subsidies will no longer be offered for policies covering:

• Newly purchased properties – this will greatly affect the marketability of grandfathered properties or those properties not paying fair rates per the loss potential.
• Lapsed policies – this is extremely important, as many people do not seem to feel the need for flood insurance and will purchase the policy following a storm and then eventually not renew.
• New policies – covering properties for the first time. The 80 percent of all NFIP policies that already pay full-risk premiums will not see large premium increases. Most policyholders will see a new charge on their premiums to cover the Reserve Fund assessment that is mandated by BW-12. Initially, there will be a 5 percent assessment to all policies except Preferred Risk Policies (PRPs). The Reserve Fund will increase over time and will also be assessed on PRPs at some undetermined future date.

What’s New in 2014?

• A Florida-based firm, The Flood ÈȵãºÚÁÏ Agency, began offering a private policy as an alternative to the NFIP, whose rates were scheduled to significantly increase as of Jan. 1, 2014, due to Biggert-Waters. The agency is making the policy available in six states including, Louisiana, South Carolina, Virginia, Connecticut, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Flood ÈȵãºÚÁÏ Agency is also scheduled to be available in Texas and several other states. It is said the policy will cost less than NFIP but more than is being paid now, and does not require an elevation certificate.
• Congress in January passed a spending bill that postpones for about eight months some of the flood insurance rate hikes triggered by Biggert-Waters. However, prospects for a broader and longer four-year delay of flood insurance changes were dealt a setback when House leadership indicated it does not support a four-year delay.

Topics Flood